Illinois Law Enacts Ban on AI Therapy Services
Illinois is thoughtfully establishing its presence in the world of AI regulation. In a significant step forward, state lawmakers have passed a bill that restricts AI from functioning as a standalone therapist and sets clear guidelines on how mental health professionals can integrate AI into their practice. Governor JB Pritzker signed the bill into law on August 1. This legislation, known as the Wellness and Oversight for Psychological Resources Act, was introduced by Representative Bob Morgan and emphasizes that only licensed professionals can provide therapeutic or psychotherapeutic services to individuals.
“We have heard concerning stories about artificial intelligence attempting to act as a licensed therapist. Individuals in distress have turned to AI for support, sometimes leading to harmful situations,” said Rep. Morgan. “Every day, AI evolves in our country, but it is essential that we implement the safeguards necessary to protect individuals. By passing HB 1806, we are taking a thoughtful approach to the advancement of AI in mental healthcare, ensuring that regulations are in place to prevent potential harm.”
Under the new state law, mental health providers are not permitted to use AI for independent therapeutic decisions, direct interactions with clients, or the creation of treatment plans unless reviewed and approved by a licensed professional. Additionally, the law closes a loophole that previously allowed unlicensed individuals to present themselves as “therapists.”
Violating this act could result in fines of up to $10,000 per offense, with penalties adjusted according to the seriousness of the violation. This law is now effective immediately, marking Illinois as the first state to regulate the application of AI in mental healthcare. It joins an expanding list of existing AI-related regulations, including recent amendments to the state’s Human Rights Act, which address the potential misuse of AI in employment settings.
The conversation surrounding AI in mental health care remains dynamic. While the potential benefits are apparent—especially given the high costs of therapy that leave many without necessary support—experts and mental health advocates raise valid concerns. At best, AI-driven therapy may introduce significant privacy risks; at worst, it might worsen an individual’s mental health situation, particularly if vulnerable users mistake a chatbot for professional assistance. “By clearly defining how AI can and cannot be utilized in mental health care,” Morgan’s statement concludes, “we’re safeguarding patients, supporting ethical providers, and ensuring that care remains in the hands of trained, licensed professionals.”
