Reasons Behind the Delays in the Humanoid Workforce

Sure, here’s the revised content without promotional call-to-actions for external websites:

—

But Rus and many others I spoke with at the expo suggest that this hype just doesn’t add up. Humanoids “are mostly not intelligent,” she said. Rus showed a video of herself speaking to an advanced humanoid that smoothly followed her instruction to pick up a watering can and water a nearby plant. It was impressive. But when she instructed it to “water” her friend, the robot didn’t consider that humans don’t need watering like plants and moved to douse the person. “These robots lack common sense,” she said.

I also spoke with Pras Velagapudi, the chief technology officer of Agility Robotics, who detailed physical limitations the company has to overcome too. To be strong, a humanoid needs a lot of power and a big battery. The stronger you make it and the heavier it is, the less time it can run without charging, and the more you need to worry about safety. A robot like this is also complex to manufacture. Some impressive humanoid demos don’t overcome these core constraints as much as they display other notable features: nimble robotic hands, for instance, or the ability to converse with people using a large language model. But these capabilities don’t necessarily translate well to the jobs that humanoids are intended to take over (it’s often more useful to program a long list of detailed instructions for a robot to follow than to speak to it, for example).

This is not to say fleets of humanoids won’t ever join our workplaces, but rather that the adoption of the technology will likely be drawn out, industry-specific, and slow. It’s related to what I wrote about last week: To those who consider AI a “normal” technology, rather than a utopian or dystopian one, this all makes sense. The technology that succeeds in an isolated lab setting will appear very different from the one that gets commercially adopted at scale.

All of this sets the scene for what happened with one of the biggest names in robotics last week. Figure AI has raised a tremendous amount of investment for its humanoids, and founder Brett Adcock claimed on X in March that the company is among the “most sought-after private stock in the secondary market.” Its most publicized work is with BMW, and Adcock has shown videos of Figure’s robots working to move parts for the automaker, stating that the partnership took just 12 months to launch. Adcock and Figure have generally not responded to media requests and don’t participate in typical robot trade shows.

In April, an article quoted a spokesperson from BMW, alleging that the partnership involves fewer robots at a smaller scale than Figure has implied. On April 25, Adcock posted on LinkedIn that “Figure’s litigation counsel will aggressively pursue all available legal remedies—including, but not limited to, defamation claims—to correct the publication’s blatant misstatements.” The author of the article did not respond to my request for comment, and a representative for Adcock and Figure declined to specify which parts of the article were inaccurate. The representative directed me to Adcock’s statement, which lacks details.

—

Let me know if you need further modifications!